bene bbbeeeeene
sapevo che c’erano altri in giro che si spaccavano gli occhi e le palle cercando su internet “constitutional reform act” e sperando che succedesse qualche miracolo.
ecco il miracolo
una intera bibliografia del mio primo capitolo xchi ne ha bisogno.
ho fatto solo un copia e incolla delle note quindi ci saranno ripetizioni ecc anche perchè va bene essere generosi ma non è che mi devo sbattere anche x voi no?
buona fortuna a tutti
segnalatemi le cose che vi vengono in mente!!!!!!!
Chatherine Fairbairn e Sally Broadbridge, The Consitutional Reform Bill, Research Paper 05/06, 13 gennaio 2005, House of Commons Library, consultabile su www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2005/rp05-006.pdf
Walter Bagehot, La costituzione inglese, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1995, p.138
Andrew Le Sueur, The Future of the United Kingdom Highest Courts, The Constitution Unit, Luglio 2001, consultabile su www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/files/top.pdf
Lord Bingham of Cornhill, A New supreme Court for the United Kingdom, The Constitution Unit Spring Lecture 2002, p.9, consultabile su: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/files/90.pdf.
Lord Steyn, The case for a Supreme Court, in ‘Law Quarterly Review’, 2002, pp. 382-396
The Times, 2 Aprile 2003
Consiglio d’Europa, Commissione per gli affari legali e i diritti umani, 28 aprile 2003, Doc. 9798, “Office of the Lord Chancellor in the constitutional system of the United Kingdom” http://assembly.coe.int/Documents/WorkingDocs/Doc03/edoc9798.htm. “the Parliamentary Assembly recommends to the United Kingdom authorities that the Lord Chancellor establish a constitutional convention whereby he no longer sits as a judge, and that consideration be given to the creation of a Supreme Court whose members could not at the same time be members of the upper house of the legislature”.
Con il quale i governi britannici richiedono in via informale alle istituzioni e altri soggetti pubblici di esprimere le loro opinioni in merito ad alcune importanti proposte di riforma.
Department for Constitutional Affairs, Constitutional Reform: a Supreme Court for the United Kingdom, http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/SupremeCourt/index.htm
Ibid, p.12 “è arrivato il tempo, per la corte di vertice del Regno Unito, di uscire dall’ombra del potere legislativo”
Ibid, p.9 “create a Supreme Court on the US model with the power to overturn legislation. Nor is there any proposal to create a specific constitutional court, or one whose primary role would be to give preliminary rulings on difficult points of law”.
Lord Falconer di Thoroton, testimonianza davanti alla Constitutional Affairs Select Committee, disponibile su http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmconst/uc628-iv/uc62802.htm
House of Lords Hansard, 20 dicembre 2004 col.1563
Prof. Robert Stevens, testimonianza davanti alla Constitutional Affairs Select Committee, “I am not certain that there is really any public opinion”. disponibile su http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldselect/ldcref/125/125.pdf
The Law Lords’ response to the Government’s consultation paper on Constitutional reform: a Supreme Court for the United Kingdom. Consultabile su http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/JudicialSCR071103.pdf
House of Lords Hansard 14 December 2004 coll.WS71, WS72, WS73
The Law Lords’ response to the Government’s consultation paper on Constitutional reform: a Supreme Court for the United Kingdom, p.1
Justice policy paper, A Supreme Court for the United Kingdom, p.5, consultabile su: http://www.justice.org.uk/images/pdfs/supreme.pdf
European Court of Human Rights, Findlay v. United Kingdom, 25 Febbraio 1997, n. 22107/93
Ibid, McGonnell v United Kingdom,, 8 Febbraio 2000, n. 28488/95
HL House of Lords Hansard, 14 dicembre 2004, par. 71
Il progetto vincitore è visibile su http://www.feildenandmawson.com/supreme-court/index.htm
Questo paragrafo è basato sulla cronologia riportata da Glenn Dymond, The Appellate Jurisdiction of the House of Lords, The House of Lords Library, 20 marzo 2006, consultabile su
[1] CITAZIONEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
[1] Per un analisi in lingua italiana dell’atto ed in particolare del lavoro della Select Committee si veda Giulia Caravale, La separazione del giudiziario. Tradizione e innovazione nel Constitutional Reform Act 2005, in ‘Nomos’, 2004, p. 59
[1] HL House of Lords Hansard, 13 luglio 2004, par. 1142-1194
[1] L’atto si può trovare on line in versione ufficiale su http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/ukpga_20050004_en_1
[1] House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution, Constitutional Reform Act 2005, House of Lords paper n°83, 2005/2006. consultabile su http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldconst/83/83.pdf
[1] Per una spiegazione analitica dell’atto si è fatto riferimento a Department of Constitutional Affairs, Constitutional Reform Act, Explenatory Notes, The Stationary Office, Londra, 2005, p.5 LINKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
[1] The constitutional Reform Act 2005, art. 23.1
[1] The Government draft’s legislative programme 2008/2009, p.63 consultabile su http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm73/7372/7372.pdf
[1] art. 35
[1] Jack Straw, consultabile sul sito ufficiale del Ministero della Giustizia
http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/announcement_081007c.htm
[1] Art. 40 e ‘schedule’ 9
[1] Traduzione di Giovanni Crisciuoli, Introduzione allo studio del diritto inglese, Giuffrè, Milano, 1994, p. 286
[1] House of Lords, Select Committee on the Constitutional Reform Bill, Constitutional Reform Bill, 2 Luglio 2004, par. 122, consultabile su http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldselect/ldcref/125/125.pdf
[1] Lady Justice Arden, Jurisdiction of the new United Kingdom Supreme Court, in ‘Public Law’, 2004, p.699
[1] HL European Union Committee, Sixth Report n. 47 2003/2004 consultabile su http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200304/ldselect/ldeucom/47/4702.htm
[1] appendice a Consiglio d’Europa, Commissione per gli affari legali e i diritti umani, 28 aprile 2003, Doc. 9798, ibid
[1] citato in Oonagh Gay e Richard Kelly, The Constitutional Reform Bill – The office of Lord Chancellor, research paper 05/05, House of Commons Library, 12 gennaio 2005, p.12
[1] Tra gli altri si veda Stevens, Reform in haste and repent at leisure, in ‘Legal Studies’, vol.24, 2004, p.1
[1] Consultation paper, Constitutional Reform: reforming the office of the Lord Chancellor, CITAZIONEEEEE e link.
[1] Oonagh Gay e Richard Kelly, ibid, p.15
[1] House of Lords Hansard, 14 luglio 2004 par.1194
[1] HL House of Lords Hansard, 7 dicembre 2004 par.740-741
[1] Oonagh Gay e Richard Kelly, ibid, p.28
[1] Art. 3 “Guarantee of continued judicial independence”
[1] Department of Constitutional Affairs, Constitutional Reform Act, Explenatory Notes, The Stationary Office, Londra, 2005, p.5 LINKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
[1] Joint Committee on Human Rights, Twenty Third Report: Scrutiny of Bills, HL paper n° 210 HC paper n° 1282 2003/2004 consultabile su http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.com/pa/jt200304/jtselect/jtrights/210/210.pdf
[1] Oonagh Gay e Richard Kelly, ibid, p.31
[1] Il testo del giuramento recita: “I, , do swear that in the office of Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain I will respect the rule of law, defend the independence of the judiciary and discharge my duty to ensure the provision of resources for the efficient and effective support of the courts for which I am responsible. So help me God.”
[1] Art 18 così come integrato dall’allegato n°6
[1] House of Lords Hansard, 4 luglio 2006, col.121
[1] CITAZIONE STEVENS
[1] Paul Jackson e Particia Leopold, Constitutional and Administrative Law, VIIIed., Sweet and Maxwell, Londra, 2001, p.431
[1] Chatherine Fairbairn e Sally Broadbridge, ibid, p.47
[1] Ibid
[1] Department for Constitutional Affairs,Consultation Paper, Constitutional Reform: a new way of appointing judges, http://www.lcd.gov.uk/consult/supremecourt/index.htm
[1] Commission for Judicial Appointments, Annual Report 2004, http://www.cja.gov.uk/files/2003_report_pdf_(final).pdf
[1] House of Commons Hansard, 14 luglio 2003, col.23 “The process of selection of judges for appointment in England and Wales must be demonstrably impartial and independent”
[1] Joint Committee on Human Rights, Scrutiny of Bills Final Progress Report, Report n°23 2003/2004, novembre 2004, HL 210 HC 1282, par. 1.55
[1] Ibid par.1.53
[1] Lords Select Committee on the Constitution Reform Bill HL Paper 125-II 2003-4
Tags: constitution, constitutional_reform_act, giurisprudenza, tesi
